i consider myself somewhat talented with a camera. and I have done my fair share of photoshop work. while I suspect there is some post process work done, it looks like a real image, and not a composite. the reflections on the car match the setting really well, and if you look through the windows, the trees are back there, and they look like they match up too.
now, there has probably been some added blur, which helps the front end pop out like it does, and have that really sharp, clean image. i say that, becuase a really small f stop, say f2.5 or something in that range, yields such a small depth of field, but in this pic, the car has good focus down the length of it, and up to the roof. You would also need a shorter exposure, which would stop capture the road and background better, becuase there is too much light there to have a small f stop, and a slow shutter speed. that would mean that they had to use a larer f stop, to gain the larger DOF.
I just want to know what kind of photography rig they used, I am sure there was a lead car, but how did they get that low to the tarmac?
__________________
2004 Titanium Gray Touring 6MT
18x8 Rota Torque - TEIN Flex Coilovers - RacingBrake Slotted Rotors F&R - Mazdatrix Stainless Lines - RacingBeat Sways F&R, REVi Intake and RAM Air Duct - A/C and Oil Cooler Screens - MAZDASPEED Front Strut Brace, Shift Knob - MAZMART Water Pump - Team Moon Custom Catback Exhaust
|
Linear Mode
